DEB's TeA PaRTy

sometimes, maybe, truth's bitter, but we still have to know it.

it is not a line from anywhere, however, i am quite sure that i'm familiar with it. it pop into my mind everytime i saw how critical these wourld could be. "truth is relative", that's what i heard from a TV show call"SHARK". then i got confuse, i got to judge the very stuffs i believe in early days. is that the thing what we call "truth" has a muti-face?

imagine that a defense attoney, who had known very well that his client was definitely not innocent, has to take his duty, use all his knowledge fight for a "NOT GUILTY". that make me think. consider that attoney as if his very myself, believe me, i'll sure feel guilty about myself if i win the case. but what if i lost, that would barely assume that i am a good lawyer. so, as the very same situation, what if i am a prosecutor. i got to make it "GUILTY". and here, i believe where the"truth is relative" come from. it's all about the word called "win".

and finally, i guess "win" is very last thing i would consider. i lost too many times, countless. but what's the deal? it doesn't really matter if the only person who deadly care about it is your very self. take a good look aroud youself, friends never leave if it's personal, what if they do, they barely call "friends"

we have to trust, at the meantime, we still have to find out what the truth is.

i guess the one said "truth's relative" could hardly trust who he/she has to fight for. if he/she does, for god sake, i would say he/she would never cease to dig deeply, whatever what's behind it.

namely, my answers for the pre-question appears, that [many stuffs could have multi-sides, crime, judgement or whatsoever, but never the truth]

------------- 

believe me, "truth apears itself". that's the very thing i never doubt. and the liars, sure have to pay back.